ArticleNeoplasia (New York, N.Y.)2025
High-dose DFMO alters protein translation in neuroblastoma.
Article in Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Polyamine Metabolism and the DHPS/eIF5A Hypusination Axis: From Metabolic Reprogramming to a Therapeutic Achilles' Heel in Melanoma.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Targeted therapies in pediatric oncology: A start.Molecular therapy. Oncology · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
DFMO has been studied as a cancer therapeutic at doses ranging from 500 to 9,000 mg/m2/day. Lower doses are favored for cancer prevention studies while higher doses, often with chemotherapy, are studied in refractory cancers. DFMO inhibits the rate-limiting enzyme in polyamine synthesis, ornithine decarboxylase (ODC), an oncogene transcriptionally regulated by MYC. MYC genes are the principal oncogenic drivers of neuroblastoma, and ODC1 is co-amplified in a subset with dismal outcome, so DFMO is a rational therapeutic candidate. Low-dose DFMO has now been FDA-approved for high-risk patients though the mechanisms for its anti-tumor activity, and the exposures required to elicit them, remain obscure. We sought to define biomarkers of activity across exposures achieved in the clinic with low through high-dose DFMO. Polyamines support protein translation by providing spermidine, which is essential to hypusinate (and activate) the elongation factor, eIF5A. Selective binding of polyamines with tRNA and rRNA provide eIF5A-independent mechanisms of translation support. We show that low-dose DFMO does not extend survival in mouse models in vivo nor alter translation biomarkers in vitro. High-dose DFMO consistently extends survival in neuroblastoma models, and, in a subset of neuroblastoma cell lines, inhibits eIF5A hypusination and global translation at achievable concentrations. However, the concentration required to engage these changes across many cell lines exceeded that achievable even with high-dose DFMO. No correlation was seen among MYCN and/or ODC1 copy number and sensitivity to DFMO. Combining high-dose DFMO with additional agents to further deplete tumor polyamines may be necessary to fully engage polyamine-depletion effects on tumors, and more granular measures of translation, including codon-resolution ribosome profiling, may be required to define these effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.