Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40774174›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2025

Comparative analysis of model antigen expression level driven by the microneme protein promoters in Eimeria tenella.

Lei Wang, Yanzhen Liao, Jingxia Suo, Lin Liang, Ruiying Liang, Jiabo Ding, Yonglan Yu, Xianyong Liu, Xun Suo, Xinming Tang

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lei WangKey Laboratory of Animal Biosafety Risk Prevention and Control (North) & Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biological Products and Chemical Drugs of MARA, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China; College of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Guangxi 541000, China.
Yanzhen LiaoKey Laboratory of Animal Biosafety Risk Prevention and Control (North) & Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biological Products and Chemical Drugs of MARA, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China; College of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Guangxi 541000, China.
Jingxia SuoNational Key Laboratory of Veterinary Public Health Security, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Lin LiangKey Laboratory of Animal Biosafety Risk Prevention and Control (North) & Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biological Products and Chemical Drugs of MARA, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.
Ruiying LiangKey Laboratory of Animal Biosafety Risk Prevention and Control (North) & Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biological Products and Chemical Drugs of MARA, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.
Jiabo DingKey Laboratory of Animal Biosafety Risk Prevention and Control (North) & Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biological Products and Chemical Drugs of MARA, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.
Yonglan YuNational Key Laboratory of Veterinary Public Health Security, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Xianyong LiuNational Key Laboratory of Veterinary Public Health Security, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Xun SuoNational Key Laboratory of Veterinary Public Health Security, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Xinming TangKey Laboratory of Animal Biosafety Risk Prevention and Control (North) & Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biological Products and Chemical Drugs of MARA, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China. Electronic address: tangxinming@caas.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coccidiosis is the most severe parasitic disease affecting the poultry industry, and live vaccines have played a pivotal role in its prevention and control, making them the most successful parasitic disease vaccines in commercial use. The components of live coccidiosis vaccines, which serve as vaccine vectors for presenting antigens from other pathogens, offer several advantages and provide a promising new option for disease control in modern poultry farming. Enhancing the expression of heterologous antigens within the complex components of Eimeria is a key strategy for optimizing coccidial vectors and improving immune efficacy. Since secreted antigens can stimulate strong immune responses in the host, we conducted a comparative analysis of the transcription levels of the microneme protein, the most important secretory organelle in apicomplexan parasites, across different stages of the life cycle. Three candidate genes with high transcription levels throughout the entire life cycle (excluding the unsporulated oocyst stage) were selected: ETH2_1343100, ETH2_0957500, and ETH2_1219600. We amplified the upstream (∼1500 bp) and downstream (∼1000 bp) regions of these genes to serve as promoters and regulatory sequences for the enhanced yellow fluorescent protein (EYFP) reporter gene expression cassette. This cassette was then incorporated into a dual-expression vector, fused with a selection marker consisting of a mutated prolyl-tRNA synthetase (PRS) gene and mCherry. After transfecting the plasmids into sporozoites and obtaining recombinant Eimeria strains with stable EYFP expression, we analyzed the fluorescence intensity of EYFP using laser confocal microscopy combined with fluorescence intensity analysis. Recombinant Eimeria driven by the histone 4 (EtHis4) promoter was used as a control. The results showed that the promoters of the three microneme protein genes regulated fluorescence expression levels approximately three times higher than the EtHis4 promoter, with the ETH2_1343100 promoter proving to be the most effective. These findings provide new regulatory sequence options for the genetic manipulation of Eimeria and the enhancement of foreign gene expression, accelerating its potential application as a vaccine vector.

Indexed as

Antigens, ProtozoanEimeria tenellaPoultry DiseasesPromoter Regions, GeneticProtozoan ProteinsAnimalsChickensCoccidiosisAntigens, ProtozoanProtozoan ProteinsCoccidiosisExpression levelMicroneme proteinModel antigenVaccine vector

Identifiers

PMID40774174
PMCPMC12540288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.