ReviewPLoS neglected tropical diseases2025
The impact of Schistosoma haematobium hybridization on molecular diagnosis of schistosomiasis: A review with emphasis on female genital schistosomiasis.
Review in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Unexpected uterine microhabitat of Schistosoma infection: a migrant case of female genital schistosomiasis in Europe.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Female genital schistosomiasis (FGS) is a gynecological manifestation of urinary schistosomiasis in female genitals. FGS is a neglected tropical disease; not only are most patients unaware of the condition, but healthcare workers and policymakers have inadequate knowledge about it. The treatment and control of FGS relies on current guidelines for controlling and eliminating schistosomiasis without rigorous focus on clinical evidence of the presence of FGS. Neglect of FGS has led to the misconception that the disease is sexually transmitted. Diagnosing FGS remains challenging as there is no widely accepted reference assay. Urine examination, which is the gold standard in urogenital schistosomiasis has some limitations in diagnosing FGS as the demonstration of Schistosoma haematobium and/or eggs alone does not necessarily indicate FGS. In order to overcome challenges with the biopsy and colposcopy approach, some studies have evaluated the potential of PCR-based assays and isothermal amplification of Schistosoma DNA. Recent studies have reported hybridization between S. haematobium and other livestock schistosomes, but little is known about the impact of hybridization on schistosomiasis diagnosis. These hybrids not only affect livestock and humans but also have their genomes modified, and in some cases, abnormal egg morphology due to Schistosoma hybridization might affect the actual prevalence estimation. Herein, we highlight the potential impacts of S. haematobium hybridization on molecular diagnosis of schistosomiasis, with an emphasis on FGS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.