ArticlePloS one2025
In-depth insight into the short-term effect of floor management practice on young apple trees development and soil microbial biodiversity and activity.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Living mulches can be considered a practice providing multi-level benefits and several ecosystem services in orchards. Two multifunctional living mulches (Mix1 - Trifolium repens (20%) and Festuca ovina (80%), Mix2 - a mixture of 10 different species suitable as flowering strip) sown during the establishment of an apple orchard, were evaluated in relation to the impact on the soil nutrient content and bacterial microbiome, as well as the growth and yield potential of the apple trees. Notwithstanding the increase of N-nitrate and N-ammonia forms induced in the soil, both living mulches mixtures limited the growth and yield potential of the apple trees during the first two growing seasons. The two mixtures induced divergent effects on the biodiversity, activity and metabolic potential of the soil bacterial microbiome, not always increasing them compared to natural cover (control). Such effects could be related to modifications that both mixtures induced in the bacterial community capacity of metabolizing some classes of C-sources compared to control. This was particularly evident for Mix2 and in summer, when all classes of C-sources utilised by the bacterial community for its metabolism resulted to be significantly more exploited than in other seasons. In conclusion, the impact of very diverse living mulch mixtures on the growth, yield potential and overall nutrient status of the young apple trees could be related to modification of the tree physiological status, indirectly derived from the modifications observed on the soil bacterial communities' composition and metabolic capacity during the whole vegetative season. These results could provide hints for the correct soil management of the orchard to foster the exploitation of soil microbiome suitable for the apple trees development and production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.