ArticlePloS one2025
Passive electroculture using copper rods does not improve yield in home container vegetable gardening.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electroculture, or the practice of applying electric fields or current to plants, has been explored for nearly three hundred years. Recently, home gardeners on social media have adopted the term electroculture to describe inserting copper-wrapped dowels into root soil as a cost-effective means of improving crop yield in small garden spaces. Given the renewed interest, big box stores have begun stocking copper-wrapped dowels as a means of improving plant growth in urban container gardens, yet whether such passive electroculture is sufficiently beneficial to plant growth to justify the cost and materials, particularly of copper, remains debated. It is likely that copper rods produce too little voltage to affect plant physiology. In this study, we tested the hypotheses that 1) inserting copper-wrapped dowel rods into the soil will not improve plant growth, photosynthesis, or yield, and 2) if copper-wrapped dowel rods improve plant growth, it is due to copper fertilization rather than electrical conductance. We tested these hypotheses on two leafy green vegetables, mustard greens and kale, and two root vegetables, beets and turnips, to determine if plant life history was an important factor in the efficacy of passive electroculture. We found no consistent evidence that passive electroculture is beneficial to crop growth or yield in container gardens. Although we documented statistically significant effects of buried copper on the above- and belowground biomass of turnips, it is unlikely that improved turnip yield was due to copper fertilization because plants grown with exposed copper rods did not show the same effect. While crop production could potentially be enhanced by the application of active electrical fields, the voltages required exceed what is produced by copper-wrapped wooden dowels. We therefore suggest that both the production and purchase of such products would waste both financial and natural resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.