ArticlePloS one2025
Discontinuation rates and predictors of Medical Cannabis cessation for chronic musculoskeletal pain.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Canadian real-world evidence: observational 24-week outcomes for health care practitioner authorized cannabis.Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Medical cannabis (MC) is increasingly used as a treatment for chronic musculoskeletal pain, but there is limited data on factors influencing its discontinuation. This study aims to investigate the rates of MC discontinuation and explore factors influencing it in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 78 patients certified for medical cannabis over a 2 year period. Patient demographics, pain origin, and Global Physical Health (GPH) and Global Mental Health (GMH) scores were collected before intervention. Discontinuation rates were measured at three-month and one-year follow-up. Statistical analyses, including Fisher's Exact Test and two-sample t-tests, were performed to assess associations between variables and discontinuation. The overall discontinuation rate of MC use was 57.9% at one year, with 44.7% of patients discontinuing within the first three months. Older age was significantly associated with higher discontinuation rates. Pain origin categories did not significantly differ between those who discontinued and continued MC use, although a higher proportion of patients in the discontinued group reported low back pain. No significant differences were observed in baseline GPH and GMH scores between the two groups. This study demonstrates a high discontinuation rate of MC use in patients for chronic musculoskeletal pain. The absence of significant differences in pain origin or baseline health scores suggests that factors beyond pain location or general health may contribute to the decision to discontinue MC. Further research is needed to explore the long-term effects of MC on pain management and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.