ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2026
JustRAIGS: Justified Referral in AI Glaucoma Screening Challenge.
Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
38 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A major contributor to permanent vision loss is glaucoma. Early diagnosis is crucial for preventing vision loss due to glaucoma, making glaucoma screening essential. A more affordable method of glaucoma screening can be achieved by applying artificial intelligence to evaluate color fundus photographs (CFPs). We present the Justified Referral in AI Glaucoma Screening (JustRAIGS) challenge to further develop these AI algorithms for glaucoma screening and to assess their efficacy. To support this challenge, we have generated a distinctive big dataset containing more than 110,000 meticulously labeled CFPs obtained from approximately 60,000 patients and 500 distinct screening centers in the USA. Our objective is to assess the practicality of creating advanced and dependable AI systems that can take a CFP as input and produce the probability of referable glaucoma, as well as outputs for glaucoma justification by integrating both binary and multi-label classification tasks. This paper presents the evaluation of solutions provided by nine teams, recognizing the team with the highest level of performance. The highest achieved score of sensitivity at a specificity level of 95% was 85%, and the highest achieved score of Hamming losses average was 0.13. Additionally, we test the top three participants' algorithms on an external dataset to validate the performance and generalization of these models. The outcomes of this research can offer valuable insights into the development of intelligent systems for detecting glaucoma. Ultimately, findings can aid in the early detection and treatment of glaucoma patients, hence decreasing preventable vision impairment and blindness caused by glaucoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.