Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40773250›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of surgery (London, England)2025

Development and validation of the NTAA prognostic model for BCLC stage B hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing transarterial chemoembolization: a retrospective multicenter cohort study.

Shuanggang Chen, Lujun Shen, Letao Lin, Han Qi, Boyang Chang, Qi Zeng, Linbin Lu, Jingjun Huang, Hongtong Tan, Fei Cao and 10 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of surgery (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Shuanggang ChenDepartment of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Lujun ShenDepartment of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Letao LinDepartment of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Han QiDepartment of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Boyang ChangDepartment of Interventional Radiology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Qi ZengDepartment of cancer center, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, Guangdong, China.
Linbin LuDepartment of Oncology, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Jingjun HuangDepartment of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Hongtong TanDepartment of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Fei CaoDepartment of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Lin XieDepartment of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Tao HuangDepartment of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Ying WuDepartment of Interventional Therapy, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Chunyong WenDepartment of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yujia WangDepartment of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Ruizhi TangDepartment of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Chen LiDepartment of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Guanglei ZhengDepartment of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Gulijiayina NuerhashiDepartment of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Weijun FanDepartment of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8757-647

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOur aim was to establish a valid new prognostic predictive tool for assessing the outcomes after TACE treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with Child-Pugh A at Barcelona clinical liver cancer stage B (BCLC B) undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). METHODS AND MATERIALS: We retrospectively analyzed 2529 HBV-related BCLC B HCC patients with Child-Pugh grade A who received initial TACE treatment, with 1075 in the primary cohort, 1076 in the internal validation cohort, and the remaining 378 in the multicenter external validation cohort. The NTAA prognostic model was constructed by Cox proportional hazards regression. The prognostic prediction performance of the NTAA prognostic model with AJCC staging and other criterion were compared by the time-dependent ROC and C-index. In addition, we included 305 patients of non-HBV-related BCLC stage B HCC who received TACE treatment in our center to further validate the predictive performance of the NTAA model.

resultsTumor size, tumor number, alpha-fetoprotein level, and albumin-bilirubin grade were found to be independent factors affecting overall survival (OS) after TACE in these patients. The NTAA prognostic model established accordingly divided patients into low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk groups, with a median survival of 68.1, 35.7, and 15.4 months, respectively. The time-dependent ROC and C-index showed that the NTAA prognostic model was better than other existing criterion and AJCC staging in predicting OS, especially in predicting early OS rates. Furthermore, the NTAA criteria were validated in the internal validation cohort, multicenter external validation cohort, and non-HBV-related HCC cohort.

conclusionThe proposed NTAA prognostic prediction model provides more accurate prognosis prediction of BCLC B HCC patients with Child-Pugh A who received TACE. The implementation of this model promises to improve the clinical decision-making process and provide more personalized treatment options for patients.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularChemoembolization, TherapeuticLiver NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRetrospective StudiesBCLC stage Bhepatocellular carcinomaNTAA prognostic modeloverall survivaltransarterial chemoembolization

Identifiers

PMID40773250
PMCPMC12695376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.