ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Machine learning and deep learning in glioblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating ex vivo platforms with AI to guide glioblastoma treatment.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Review
- Article
- A Language Performance Model for Predicting Glioma Recurrence and Molecular Biomarkers: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Brain and behavior · 2026Article
- Histone H4K8 lactylation promotes glioblastoma progression by inducing NUPR1-mediated autophagosome‒lysosome fusion.Theranostics · 2026Article
- Machine learning-assisted prognosis prediction and surgical decision-making for glioblastoma: perceived benefits and concerns of patients, caregivers, and neurosurgeons.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionGlioblastoma (GBM) is the most malignant primary brain cancer, associated with a median overall survival of 15 months. Traditional diagnosis and prognosis heavily rely on clinical examination and histological investigation, both of which are subjective and time-consuming. advances in machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) have largely accelerated the research of GBMs by enhancing tumour segmentation, molecular characterization and survival prediction. METHODOLOGY: We refer to the PRISMA guidelines to report this systematic review and meta-analysis. A total of 44 studies published from 2021 to 2025 were analyzed. We thoroughly searched the following sources: PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science. Review-specific inclusion criteria included studies reporting on diagnostic, prognostic, or response-prediction tasks in GBM that used ML/DL models and reports on quantitative performance metrics. The independent random-effects model estimated the performance of each clinical task, and subgroup analysis determined the variables influencing model accuracy.
resultsThe performance of the machine and deep learning models was strong across different clinical tasks. For overall survival prognosis, the pooled C-index was 0.78 (95%CI 0.74-0.82, I
conclusionAlthough AI techniques have demonstrated encouraging results in GBM studies for various clinical tasks, substantial challenges still preclude efficient clinical applicability. These developments can potentially improve medical practice with improved diagnosis, personalized treatment and fewer invasive procedures. Nevertheless, variation in data, weak external validation, and missing prospective clinical studies warrant careful interpretation of these results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.