ArticleFish physiology and biochemistry2025
Comparison of responses to rapid changes in salinity between Hippocampus kuda and Oryzias melastigma.
Article in Fish physiology and biochemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In order to explore the similarities and differences of responses between Hippocampus kuda and Oryzias melastigma, this study analyzed and compared them from the aspects of growth, behavior, physiology, and gene expression. The results showed that H. kuda had a greater impact on its feeding behavior compared to O. melastigma at the same rates. And the continuous responses of enzymes indicated there was a more persistent stress in H. kuda, with stress-related genes like sod1 showing a slower response. Additionally, genes related to sugar and lipid metabolism were significantly different in H. kuda compared to O. melastigma. H. kuda exhibited sensitivity to nearly all treatments, while O. melastigma only responded to treatments of direct input. Furthermore, the responses of immune-related genes in H. kuda were also slower than those in O. melastigma. In summary, the osmotic pressure regulation ability of O. melastigma was more efficient than that of H. kuda in dealing with the stress caused by rapid changes in salinity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.