ArticleAnnals of hematology2025
Somatic mutations and the efficacy of immunosuppressive therapy in severe/very severe aplastic anemia and transfusion-dependent nonsevere aplastic anemia.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the prevalence of somatic mutations (SMs) in severe/very severe aplastic anemia (V/SAA) and transfusion-dependent nonsevere aplastic anemia (TD-NSAA) prior to immunosuppressive therapy (IST) and their impact on treatment efficacy. Next-generation sequencing was used to analyze 114 hematopoiesis-related genes at disease onset in 312 patients. SMs were detected in 17.9% of cases, involving 25 genes, most commonly DNMT3A (14, 20.9%) and BCOR (9, 13.4%). SMs were more frequent in patients over 40 years old, predominantly with a single mutation of low variant allele frequency (< 20%). Patients with SM were older and had lower lymphocyte counts. SMs did not significantly influence hematologic responses at 3, 6, or 12 months, relapse, progression, death, survival, or failure-free survival (p > 0.05). Grouping patients by mutated genes revealed no significant differences in IST efficacy, though Group I (PIGA or BCOR/BCORL1) showed higher hematologic response rates in patients over 40 years of age. The cumulative incidence of clonal evolution was higher in Group II (DNMT3A, TET2, ASXL1, FAT1, or RUNX1), though not statistically significant. SMs in V/SAA and TD-NSAA were infrequent and did not affect IST outcomes or treatment decisions. However, the higher clonal evolution incidence in certain mutations warrants further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.