ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2025
Developing critical thinking and decision-making skills for cancer information: the Informed Health Choice-Cancer online learning resource.
Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving Critical Appraisal of Cancer-Related Health Information: A Pilot Randomised Trial of the Informed Health Choices-Cancer Programme.Psycho-oncology · 2026Trial
- Interventions to promote critical health literacy: a scoping review.Health promotion international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposePeople impacted by cancer face increasing challenges in navigating a landscape of abundant health information and misinformation. This study outlines the development and pilot testing of the Informed Health Choices-Cancer (IHC-C) learning resource, designed to provide users the skills and knowledge necessary to think critically about the reliability of health claims and make well-informed choices. This study outlines the development and pilot testing of this learning resource.
methodsUsing a human-centred design approach, the resource was co-developed with those impacted by cancer through iterative refinement. Tailored content and multimedia formats were used to support over three stages of pilot testing: initial prototype development, testing with small stakeholder groups, and testing with a broader sample. Quantitative ratings and qualitative feedback guided improvements in accessibility, usability, and relevance.
resultsThirty-three participants responded positively to the resource, noting its accessible language, practical content, and engaging format. In the final round of testing, over 80% found the resource as 'very well aligned' with learning outcomes, 'very easy to understand', 'very relevant' to cancer, and 'very easy to navigate'. Navigation ratings improved from 50.0% at prototype stage to 85.4% at final stage. The resource was perceived as effective in supporting critical thinking, informed decision-making, and reflecting real-life cancer experiences.
conclusionsThe IHC-C learning resource offers an innovative, practical tool for integrating critical thinking into cancer care. It shows promise in supporting informed decision-making and reduces vulnerability to misinformation. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: The resource may enhance health literacy and empower survivors to critically evaluate health information and manage their care more confidently.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40773092What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.