ReviewDiabetologia2025
Ethnic diversity in precision medicine: a reality or an aspiration?
Review in Diabetologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impacting lives of people with diabetes: lessons learnt in India may be applicable to other low- and middle-income countries.Diabetologia · 2026Review
- Patterns of complication burden in people with diabetes: a latent class analysis approach.Acta diabetologica · 2026Article
- From pancreas and islet resources to diabetes insights.Diabetologia · 2026Review
- Redefining the challenges of gestational diabetes mellitus in ethnically diverse populations.Endocrine · 2026Article
- Genome-Wide Association Studies of Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Literature Review.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- Validation of an algorithm for selection of SGLT2 and DPP4 inhibitor therapies in people with type 2 diabetes across major UK ethnicity groups: a retrospective cohort study.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2026Article
- Nutrigenomics meets multi-omics: integrating genetic, metabolic, and microbiome data for personalized nutrition strategies.Genes & nutrition · 2025Review
- Diabetes prevention and treatment: a global perspective.Diabetologia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Precision medicine seeks to tailor prevention, diagnosis and treatment strategies to the biological and contextual characteristics of individuals. In diabetes, where there is substantial heterogeneity in risk, progression and treatment response, this approach holds particular promise. However, the majority of precision medicine research has been conducted in populations of White European ancestry, limiting its relevance and equity across ethnically diverse groups. This review examines the role of ethnicity in precision diabetes medicine, highlighting its potential value and limitations. It summarises evidence for ethnic variation in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes, including differences in susceptibility, phenotypes and complications, and demonstrates how under-representation in research has led to diagnostic and therapeutic blind spots. Three conceptual models for incorporating ethnicity into precision approaches are described: ancestry-anchored discovery, ethnicity-adapted translation and trait-based individualisation. Each model presents distinct opportunities for and challenges to equitable implementation. The review also outlines key barriers, such as limited diversity in discovery science, inconsistent data infrastructure, and resource constraints, and proposes practical strategies to overcome them. It concludes by identifying critical research gaps and emphasises the need for inclusive and context-sensitive models of precision medicine that account for both inter- and intra-ethnic diversity. Realising this vision will be essential to delivering effective and equitable diabetes care globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.