ArticleBrain tumor pathology2025
Association between autologous formalin-fixed tumor vaccine (AFTV) therapy, molecular pathological markers, and survival outcomes in glioblastoma.
Article in Brain tumor pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is a primary brain tumor, characterized by rapid progression, high recurrence rates, and resistance to standard therapies. Current treatment modalities provide limited survival benefits, highlighting the need for novel therapeutic strategies. This retrospective study evaluated the efficacy of autologous formalin-fixed tumor vaccine (AFTV) in 375 patients with newly diagnosed GBM. Patients receiving AFTV therapy (n = 164) showed significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS; 14.0 months vs. 8.7 months, p = 0.03) and overall survival (OS; 32.0 months vs. 21.9 months, p < 0.01) compared with the non-AFTV group (n = 211). Subgroup analyses revealed that AFTV therapy was particularly effective in patients with wild-type IDH tumors and those negative for PD-L1 and p53 expression. In contrast, patients whose tumors were positive for both PD-L1 and p53 exhibited significantly poorer outcomes. These findings suggest that the combination of PD-L1 and p53 status may serve as a useful biomarker for predicting AFTV responsiveness, reflecting the influence of the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment on treatment efficacy. These findings establish AFTV as a promising treatment option for GBM and highlight the importance of molecular profiling in treatment selection. Future studies should explore combining AFTV with immune checkpoint inhibitors to enhance efficacy in PD-L1-positive cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.