ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2025
A predictive model for differentiating causes of elevated mechanical prosthetic aortic valve gradient.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In managing aortic prosthetic valves (APVs), increased transvalvular gradients present significant diagnostic challenges, often requiring advanced multimodality imaging (MMI). Predictive models can offer valuable insights in resource-limited settings. This study aimed to develop a predictive model to differentiate between causes of high mechanical prosthetic aortic valve gradients the causes of high gradients in mechanical prosthetic aortic valves. This retrospective study, conducted at a tertiary cardiology center, included 159 patients with high-gradient mechanical prosthetic aortic valves admitted between February 2020 and April 2024. Clinical evaluations involved included detailed examinations, laboratory findings, time in therapeutic range (TTR), and MMI techniques. Among the patients, 102 had patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM), 22 had thrombus, and 35 had pannus-related high-gradients. A multivariate multinomial logistic regression model was used to predict the diagnostic groups. The most significant variables, according to partial chi-square values, were APV opening angle, acceleration time (AT), APV age (> 5 years), APV size, and effective TTR. APV opening angle and AT explained 65% of the outcome variation. The model's macro-average multi-class AUC was 0.95, with individual AUC values of 0.98, 0.94, and 0.94 for mismatch PPM, thrombus, and pannus, respectively. The polytomous discrimination index (PDI) was 0.87 overall. This study developed a predictive model to distinguish between PPM, thrombus, and pannus formation in high-gradient mechanical aortic valves. Valve opening angle and acceleration time were the most significant predictors. The model supports the use of simple tools like echocardiography and cinefluoroscopy, especially in settings without access to advanced imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40773028What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.