ArticleIrish journal of medical science2025
Diagnostic accuracy of Neer's impingement test for subacromial shoulder impingement.
Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Subacromial bursitis: current evidence and future directions in injection-based therapies-A narrative review.Annals of medicine · 2026Review
- Association Between Postoperative Subacromial Impingement Syndrome and Functional Recovery After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair in Elderly Patients: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Clinical interventions in aging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSubacromial impingement syndrome (SIS) is one of the most common causes of shoulder pain, encompassing a spectrum of conditions ranging from bursitis to partial or complete rotator cuff tears. The Neer's impingement test is frequently used for clinical diagnosis, yet its accuracy remains debated. This study aims to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, Positive predictive value (PPV), Negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy of Neer's test against Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as the gold standard.
methodsA prospective study was conducted on 500 shoulders at a tertiary care centre. Patients presenting with unilateral or bilateral shoulder pain of at least three weeks duration underwent clinical evaluation using Neer's sign and Neer's test. Those with a positive Neer's sign were included and underwent subacromial lignocaine injection, followed by reassessment. All patients underwent MRI, and the results were compared. Diagnostic parameters including sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and diagnostic accuracy were calculated.
resultsThe study population had a mean age of 46.3 years with a male-to-female ratio of 2:1. MRI confirmed SIS in 81% of cases. Neer's test demonstrated a sensitivity of 79.0%, specificity of 63.2%, PPV of 90.1%, NPV of 41.4%, and diagnostic accuracy of 76.0%. Diagnostic accuracy was higher in rotator cuff pathologies (81.6%) compared to subacromial bursitis (70.4%). The test showed greater sensitivity (90%) for partial supraspinatus tears, but lower specificity.
conclusionNeer's test is a reliable, sensitive tool for diagnosing SIS, particularly in partial rotator cuff tears. However, its specificity remains moderate, warranting cautious interpretation alongside imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40773000What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.