Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40772832›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of pain (London, England)2025

Self-Chosen Music as a Contributor to Music-Induced Analgesia Across Diverse Socio-Cultural Backgrounds: A Crossover Randomised Controlled Trial.

Antonia S Becker, Emilie S van der Valk Bouman, Julian Schaap, Koen van Eijck, Zahra Bierman, Charlotte Saat, Hans Jeekel, Cecile C de Vos, Markus Klimek

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of pain (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Antonia S BeckerDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1381-114X
Emilie S van der Valk BoumanDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7807-4390
Julian SchaapDepartment of Arts and Culture Studies, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3656-4225
Koen van EijckDepartment of Arts and Culture Studies, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1462-145X
Zahra BiermanDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Charlotte SaatDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Hans JeekelDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Cecile C de VosCentre for Pain Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7210-1693
Markus KlimekDepartment of Anesthesiology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0122-9929

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMusic-induced analgesia (MIA) has been extensively studied, but the role of socio-cultural background, which shapes music preferences and perceptions, remains unexplored. This study investigates whether the effect of preferred music on pain endurance remains consistent across different socio-cultural backgrounds.

methodsIn a crossover randomised controlled trial (n = 84), participants underwent three auditory interventions in a randomised sequence: self-chosen music, researcher-chosen (classical) music and a podcast (control). After 20 min, pain endurance was tested by increasing electric stimuli while participants continued listening. Additionally, pain threshold, perceived pain scores, heart rate variability (HRV) and emotions were measured.

resultsCompared with the control condition, self-chosen music significantly increased pain endurance (β = 0.74, p = 0.003) and reduced pain intensity (β = -0.43, p < 0.001) and unpleasantness (β = -0.38, p = 0.007). Both self-chosen (β = 0.32, p = 0.034) and researcher-chosen music (β = 0.37, p = 0.018) increased the pain threshold compared to the control condition. These pain measurements were not influenced by participants' socio-cultural background (cultural capital, level of education). HRV analysis revealed more parasympathetic activity with the researcher-chosen music and higher heart rate with the self-chosen music than with the control intervention.

conclusionsListening to self-chosen music was effective in MIA, irrespective of socio-cultural background or type of music. In contrast, researcher-chosen (classical) music was most effective in enhancing parasympathetic activity. This study highlights that self-selected music in line with personal preferences is effective for pain relief, encouraging personalised approaches in MIA. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This study revealed that self-chosen music significantly enhances pain endurance and reduces subjective pain scores, regardless of socio-cultural background and type of music. In contrast, researcher-chosen (classical) music increases parasympathetic activity, indicating a more 'relaxed' state. These findings suggest that different types of music may serve different functions, with self-chosen music being especially effective for pain relief. Encouraging patients to self-select their music could improve pain management outcomes, underscoring the importance of personalised approaches when using music for pain relief.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaMusicMusic TherapyPainPain ManagementAdultCross-Over StudiesFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPain ThresholdYoung Adultheart rate variabilitymusicmusic‐induced analgesiapainsocio‐cultural background

Identifiers

PMID40772832
PMCPMC12330777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.