Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40772815›Full record

ReviewJournal of aerosol medicine and pulmonary drug delivery2025

Spacers and Valved Holding Chambers.

Sunalene Devadason

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of aerosol medicine and pulmonary drug delivery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sunalene DevadasonDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Western Australia Medical School, Perth, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spacers, primarily valved holding chambers (VHCs), are widely used to overcome some of the problems associated with the use of pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs). These include the difficulty experienced by patients in trying to coordinate the initiation of inhalation with the actuation of the pMDI. High oropharyngeal deposition of drug, which may result in both local and systemic side effects, is also a problem. Although the variability in output from pMDIs under optimized conditions in the laboratory is low, the variability when used in clinical practice is likely to increase considerably. Hence, the dose introduced into a holding chamber may vary significantly depending on the way in which the pMDI canister is handled before it is actuated. Several studies have shown that various design factors can influence the dose delivered from a holding chamber. These include spacer volume, shape, valve design, using multiple actuations, delay between actuation and inhalation, and construction material, which affects the level of electrostatic charge accumulating on the spacer surfaces. Several spacers which are made from low or anti-static materials are now available. Recommendations for optimal use of spacers, including inhalation techniques are outlined in this chapter, and vary according to patient age and inhalation coordination capability. Efficiency of drug delivery and lung deposition are also dependent on pMDI drug formulation and the patient's anatomical and physiological characteristics.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsInhalation SpacersMetered Dose InhalersAdministration, InhalationEquipment DesignHumansLungPharmaceutical PreparationsPharmaceutical Preparationselectrostatic chargeextension devicesface mask versus mouthpieceInhalers and accessory devicesspacer volume

Identifiers

PMID40772815
PMCPMC12435187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.