Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40772789›Full record

ArticleDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2025

Building and rebuilding complex tissues: strategic visions from a research-led workshop.

N Sumru Bayin, Benjamin Steventon, Mekayla Storer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Development (Cambridge, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

N Sumru BayinGurdon Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1QN, UK.
Benjamin SteventonDepartment of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EH, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7838-839X
Mekayla StorerDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EG, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/W003872/1Royal Society RGS\R1\231143Wellcome 226520/Z/22/ZWellcome 227294/Z/23/ZWellcome - MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of CambridgeWellcome Trust 225360/Z/22/ZWellcome Trust 226520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How complex tissues develop and regenerate post-injury is one of the most fascinating and important processes in biology. Recent technical advances that enable the generation of a quantitative understanding of these processes have the potential to transform the field. However, to achieve this, concerted and long-term studies are required at the community level to compare regeneration and wound healing in both regenerative and non-regenerative contexts and organisms. To stimulate such collaboration, we recently organised a focused workshop around this topic to identify key outstanding questions that focus on cross-comparisons of regenerative competence, and the cellular, molecular and physical drivers of regeneration. Importantly, the discussions also highlighted significant logistical and financial challenges in initiating and sustaining large-scale, long-term interdisciplinary studies, particularly those involving non-model organisms.

Indexed as

RegenerationWound HealingAnimalsCongresses as TopicHumansCommunity buildingComparative analysisNon-model organismsRegeneration

Identifiers

PMID40772789
PMCPMC7618443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.