ArticleJournal of vision2025
The role of scene context in object recognition: Timing and mechanisms.
Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One remarkable aspect of human perception is the ability to extract the meaning of a target within a complex scene quickly. Consistent scenes between targets and backgrounds enhance visual understanding, yet the precise timing and underlying mechanisms of this effect remain unclear. To address this, two experiments were conducted exploring how object category, scene orientation, and scene consistency influence object recognition under conscious (Experiment 1) and unconscious (Experiment 2) conditions. Both experiments revealed an animate advantage, facilitation by scene consistency, and orientation-specific enhancements in object recognition. Performance was improved when both the object and the scene were upright, and furniture targets were more affected by scene consistency than animal targets. Specifically, under the conscious condition, the animate advantage was observed only for inconsistent scenes, whereas under the unconscious condition, the animate advantage was not influenced by scene consistency. Interestingly, in the unconscious state, the effects of target category and background orientation depended on scene consistency, with animals consistent with the background and furniture inconsistent with the background both influenced by orientation. These results suggest that scene context influences object recognition in the early stage of visual processing, and furniture recognition is more sensitive to contextual regularities than animal recognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.