ArticleANZ journal of surgery2025
The Predictive Effect of "Real Amylase Value": A More Accurate Predictor for Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula.
Article in ANZ journal of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Predictive Effect of "Real Amylase Value": A More Accurate Predictor for Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula.ANZ journal of surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPostoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a common and serious complication following pancreatic surgery. While several studies have attempted to predict the development of POPF using drain amylase concentration, predictive values vary widely due to factors like abdominal irrigation and chylous drainage, which can dilute the amylase levels. This study aims to evaluate whether the "Real Amylase Value" (RAV), calculated as the product of drain amylase concentration and drainage volume, provides a more reliable prediction of POPF compared to conventional amylase concentration. Better prediction of pancreatic fistula development could lead to closer clinical monitoring of these patients, reassessment of hospital stay duration, and more careful management of drains over an extended period. Additionally, carefully managing the timing of drain removal may improve patient recovery and discharge process. METHODOLOGY: Data from 198 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and distal pancreatectomy (DP) were retrospectively analyzed. Drain amylase concentrations and drainage volumes were measured on postoperative days (POD) 1 and 3, and the RAV (U) was calculated. Real Amylase Value (RAV) (U) was calculated using the formula: RAV (U) = Drain Amylase Concentration (U/L) × Drainage Amount (L). Predictive values for POPF were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, comparing conventional amylase concentration (U/L) and RAV (U).
resultsOn POD1, the RAV (U) demonstrated greater predictive value for POPF compared to the conventional drain amylase concentration (U/L) with an area under the ROC curve (AUROC) of 0.85 versus 0.79, respectively. Similarly, on POD3, RAV showed superior predictive accuracy (AUROC 0.89) compared to amylase concentration (AUROC 0.79).
conclusionThe RAV (U) offers a more accurate and reliable prediction of POPF than traditional drain amylase concentration (U/L), with improved sensitivity and specificity. This method could refine clinical management, particularly in the timing of drain removal and early intervention strategies for patients at high risk of developing pancreatic fistulas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.