Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40772572›Full record

ArticleThe Milbank quarterly2025

Advancing Equity: Lean Leader Practices and a Path Forward.

Dorothy Y Hung, Lillian C Levy, Thomas G Rundall, Elina Reponen, William Huen, Stephen M Shortell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Milbank quarterly, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dorothy Y HungSchool of Public Health, University of California at Berkeley.ORCID 0000-0003-3099-917X
Lillian C LevySchool of Public Health, University of California at Berkeley.
Thomas G RundallSchool of Public Health, University of California at Berkeley.
Elina ReponenHUS Shared Group Services, Customer Relations, Helsinki University Hospital.
William HuenZuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, University of California at San Francisco.
Stephen M ShortellSchool of Public Health, University of California at Berkeley.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Policy Points This study highlights health care leaders' use of lean management practices to advance equity and scale initiatives supporting the delivery of high-quality care for all patients. As a next step in this work, there is a need to develop new measurement systems with clearly defined performance metrics that ensure accountability to equity standards. Standards can be reinforced by government agencies, professional associations, and accrediting bodies. Examples include building equity-specific metrics into Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' Medicare Advantage STAR ratings, American Medical Group Association and America's Physician Groups recognition programs, National Committee for Quality Assurance certification criteria for health plans, and Joint Commission accreditation for hospitals. CONTEXT: Lean management is a sociotechnical approach to quality improvement that aims for consistency in work processes and outcomes. This can be leveraged to reduce inequities by ensuring delivery of high-quality care to meet the needs of patients with diverse backgrounds. Despite recent efforts in the field, there is limited study on how managers implement health equity and workforce diversity goals as strategies to improve patient care. Given the important role of leadership in fostering workplace culture, we examined leader activities and specifically their use of lean management practices to support equity initiatives in health care.

methodsWe conducted in-depth interviews with 67 leaders ranging from C-suite executives to frontline managers in five US hospital-health systems. Interview transcripts were analyzed and validated via parallel coding, yielding an interrater agreement of 92.6%. We identified cross-cutting themes on how leaders use lean methods to promote equity in care settings, and elicited insights regarding barriers, facilitators, and recommendations for continuous improvement.

findingsLeaders highlighted the lean daily management system (DMS) as a robust platform to introduce and scale systemwide equity initiatives. The DMS consists of standardized practices including tiered huddles, leader rounding, and problem-solving that enable employees to accomplish daily tasks in alignment with organizational priorities. Humble inquiry was also cited as an effective way to address patient safety issues while fostering cultural humility and learning. Leaders strongly recommend integrating equity into other strategic goals (quality, affordability, patient/employee experience) and stratifying data to inform key performance indicators. Recommendations to strengthen accountability include setting equity goals and building them into performance evaluations, clearly communicating cultural norms and expectations, and creating equity-focused data reporting systems as the next step or evolution in this work.

conclusionsHealth care leaders can use lean management to advance equity by reducing variation in care processes and improving measurement of outcomes across diverse populations.

Indexed as

Health EquityLeadershipQuality ImprovementTotal Quality ManagementHumansOrganizational CultureUnited Stateshealth care leadershiphealth equityhospital/health systemslean managementqualitative researchquality/process improvementwork culture/environmentworkforce diversity

Identifiers

PMID40772572
PMCPMC12438453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.