SynthesisPharmacotherapy2025
Biological Therapy and Small Molecules for Adults With Crohn's Disease: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Pharmacotherapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
First-line therapeutic approaches for Crohn's disease include immunosuppressants, aminosalicylates, and corticosteroids. However, more than one-third of patients are resistant to these treatments and require second-line therapies. Our goal was to synthesize the evidence on the efficacy and safety of biologics and small molecules for inducing remission in patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease. A systematic review was conducted by searching for randomized controlled trials on the target population in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (March 2025). Data synthesis for the outcomes of remission, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and safety was performed using network meta-analyses and surface under the cumulative rating curve (SUCRA) analyses. The results were presented as risk ratios with 95% credible intervals. We included 55 trials (n = 16,113 patients) evaluating 26 biological drugs across 83 doses and six small molecules across 15 doses. Similar results were obtained in the sensitivity analyses conducted across different measurement time points. Alongside infliximab 5 mg/kg (SUCRA 98.6%), 10 mg/kg (92%), and 20 mg/kg intravenous (91.8%), the recently approved drugs guselkumab 1200 mg (83.2%), 600 mg (89.2%), and 200 mg intravenous (90.1%), as well as mirikizumab 600 mg (91.5%) and 1000 mg intravenous (82.4%) presented higher probabilities of disease remission and were associated with increased HRQoL. Drugs such as certolizumab, andecaliximab, fontolizumab, abatacept, and etanercept ranked low for remission (SUCRA < 40%) and presented high probabilities of serious adverse events (over 60%). Small molecules presented an intermediate profile. Inhibitors of interleukin-23 appear to be promising alternatives for the treatment of moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease. Given their safety profile, some anti-TNF drugs should be avoided in practice. Trial Registration: PROSPERO: CRD42024519150.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.