ArticleCancer2025
Contemporary outcomes of octa-nonagenarians with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia.
Article in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dose-Adjusted Treatment With 7-Day Venetoclax Plus Azacitidine or Decitabine in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukaemia.European journal of haematology · 2026Article
- Impact of diagnosis-to-treatment interval on the outcome of patients with acute myeloid leukemia.Annals of hematology · 2026Article
- Contemporary outcomes of octa-nonagenarians with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia.Cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOcta-nonagenarians with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) represent a high-risk group due to frequently poor performance status, adverse genomics (e.g., TP53 mutations, complex karyotype), a high incidence of secondary AML, and inability to undergo an allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Evaluating their outcomes with modern treatment approaches is important.
methodsThis retrospective study analyzed outcomes of patients ≥80 years old with newly diagnosed AML treated at our center from 2013-2023.
resultsA total of 289 patients (median age, 83 years; range, 80-95 years) were included. Venetoclax containing low-intensity therapy was administered to 107 patients (37.0%). AML subtypes included de novo (123, 42.6%), secondary (114, 39.4% [82 treated-secondary, 32 untreated-secondary]), therapy-related without prior myeloid neoplasm (40, 13.8%), and post-myeloproliferative neoplasm AML (12, 4.3%). Composite complete response (CRc) was achieved in 43.2%, with higher rates in venetoclax-treated patients (61.7% vs. 32.4%, p < .001). Median relapse-free survival among patients with a CRc was 6.5 months. Median overall survival (OS) was 6.2 months; 13.7 months for those achieving CRc. One-year nonrelapse mortality was 18.4%. Median OS was 7.7 months with venetoclax versus 5.4 months without. In de novo AML, median OS with venetoclax was 11.1 months. Among venetoclax-treated patients, favorable subgroups (e.g., NPM1 and/or IDH1/2 mutations and/or myelodysplasia related mutations without TP53 mutation and adverse cytogenetics) achieved OS up to 16.0-16.3 months. On multivariate analysis, de novo AML, wild-type TP53, and venetoclax therapy were independently associated with improved OS.
conclusionsLow-intensity venetoclax-based regimens offer meaningful survival benefits in selected octa-nonagenarian patients with AML, particularly those with favorable genomic profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.