ArticleCancer medicine2025
Trajectories of Cognitive Complaints in Patients With Breast Cancer and Their Association With Psychosocial and Neurobiological Factors.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identifying pre-treatment risk factors for cancer-related cognitive decline in patients with breast cancer.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2026Article
- Cognitive profiles and predictors of cancer-related cognitive impairment in breast cancer survivors: integrating self-reported, neuropsychological, and process-based measures.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2026Article
- Efficacy of Cognitive Training for Treating Cancer-related Cognitive Impairment: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis by Cognitive Domain.Neuropsychology review · 2026Review
- Trajectories of Cognitive Complaints in Patients With Breast Cancer and Their Association With Psychosocial and Neurobiological Factors.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionCancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) is common among patients with breast cancer, with significant variability in both severity and duration of cognitive complaints. This study aimed to elucidate this variability by identifying distinct trajectories of cognitive complaints over time in patients with breast cancer. Additionally, we explored the relationships between these trajectories and various clinical, demographic, psychosocial, neuropsychological, neuroimaging (resting-state functional MRI, rs-fMRI), and serum markers.
methodsIn this prospective study, 67 patients with non-metastatic breast cancer underwent psychosocial questionnaires, neuropsychological testing, rs-fMRI, and serum markers at diagnosis (T0), 8 months after diagnosis (T1), and 16 months after diagnosis (T2). Using the partition around medoids (PAM) algorithm on the difference scores of cognitive complaints, patients were clustered into distinct groups. Differences between the groups were assessed using linear mixed effects models. Rs-fMRI was analyzed using whole-brain graph theory and connectivity in four cognition-related networks.
resultsFour different trajectories of cognitive complaints were identified: stable with no changes in complaints (n = 24), improving with a decrease in complaints at T1 (n = 15), a short-term affected with an increase in complaints at T1 and recovery at T2 (n = 13), and a long-term affected with an increase in complaints at T1 and T2 (n = 15). While the groups strongly correlated with changes in the psychosocial measures, only subtle associations were found with neuropsychological tests, serum markers, or rs-fMRI analyses.
conclusionsThis research affirmed the presence of distinct trajectories of cognitive complaints in patients with breast cancer, which were associated with differences in anxiety, fatigue, stress, and depression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.