ArticleCancer medicine2025
Investigation of Treatment-Related Disparities in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Patients Using Real-World Data.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with a diagnosis of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma in the United States, 2019-2024.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Investigation of Treatment-Related Disparities in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Patients Using Real-World Data.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRacial disparities exist in the overall treatment of patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPDAC). Compared to White patients, patients of color are less likely to undergo surgical resection for early-stage disease and receive chemotherapy. This study explored the time to first treatment (T2FT), receipt of standard guideline-concordant first-line therapies, and overall survival in an mPDAC population by race/ethnicity.
methodsUtilizing real-world United States data from the Flatiron Health electronic health record (EHR) derived, deidentified database, T2FT was defined as the difference between the diagnosis date of mPDAC and the initiation of first-line systemic anticancer therapy in days; receipt of standard-guideline concordant first-line therapy was defined based on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. We assessed disparities in T2FT and overall survival by race using Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards regression models.
resultsIn the study population of interest, there was a significant difference in T2FT for Black compared to White patients. This effect is attributable to the first 2 months following diagnosis. There was no evidence of a difference by race after 2 months. Receipt of first-line therapy and the median number of standard-guidelines therapies did not significantly differ by race/ethnicity. IMPLICATIONS: Our findings suggest that there is a modest difference in T2FT by race/ethnicity in the initial time period following diagnosis of mPDAC, but no reported difference in overall survival. Additional studies using a larger, more diverse cohort of patients are recommended to better understand the effects of race/ethnicity on the treatment and survival of patients with mPDAC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.