Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40772458›Full record

ArticleGlobal change biology2025

Trade-Offs and Synergies Between Climate Change Mitigation, Biodiversity Preservation, and Agro-Economic Development Across Future Land-Use Scenarios in Brazil.

Thomas M R Gérard, Sietze J Norder, Judith A Verstegen, Jonathan C Doelman, Stefan C Dekker, Floor van der Hilst

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global change biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thomas M R GérardCopernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0002-4762-8711
Sietze J NorderCopernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Judith A VerstegenDepartment of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Jonathan C DoelmanCopernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6842-573X
Stefan C DekkerCopernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Floor van der HilstCopernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6839-9375

Funding

AXA Investment Managers, in partnership with the AXA Research Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Land-use change is a major driver of biodiversity loss and a key contributor to GHG emissions, making sustainable land use essential for biodiversity preservation and climate change mitigation. The impacts of land use change are location-specific, shaped by the biophysical context. Consequently, the extent and nature of these impacts are deeply influenced by the spatial configuration of land-use change. This is particularly relevant for Brazil, a global agricultural powerhouse, where agricultural expansion impacts biodiversity-rich and carbon-rich biomes. Understanding the future land-use trade-offs and synergies between agro-economic development, biodiversity preservation, and climate change mitigation is crucial to support sustainable land use in Brazil. In this study, we quantified these trade-offs and synergies for three SSP-based land-use change scenarios projected for 2050. For each scenario, we assessed the spatial variation in impacts on carbon stocks, mammal distributions, and agricultural revenues. Our results show that the agricultural economy is projected to grow at the expense of biodiversity preservation and climate change mitigation objectives, and vice versa. These trade-offs and synergies result from changes in natural vegetation and agricultural land, driven by shifting demand for agricultural products. In particular, under the SSP3-7.0 scenario, rising agricultural demand between 2015 and 2050 is projected to drive agricultural expansion into natural areas, increasing annual agricultural revenue by 36.5 billion USD

Indexed as

AgricultureBiodiversityClimate ChangeConservation of Natural ResourcesEconomic DevelopmentAnimalsBrazilagricultural expansioncarbon sequestrationdeforestationenvironmental impactsGHG emissionsland use changespecies richness

Identifiers

PMID40772458
PMCPMC12329712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.