ReviewThe New phytologist2025
Thresholds for spring freeze: measuring risk to improve predictions in a warming world.
Review in The New phytologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Refreshing perspectives in a warming world: understanding the cold adaptation strategies of plants - an introduction to a Virtual Issue.The New phytologist · 2026Article
- Overcompensation of vegetation productivity after late-spring frost in the Northern Hemisphere.Nature plants · 2026Article
- Tree growth response and adaptation to climate change and climate extremes: From canopy to stem.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2026Review
- Cold hardiness dynamics predict budbreak and associated low-temperature threats in grapevine.The New phytologist · 2026Article
- Cold hardiness mechanisms and modeling: existing approaches and future avenues.The New phytologist · 2026Review
- Molecular mechanisms of plant freezing tolerance: from cold signal perception to adaptive responses.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Continuous frost causes a greater reduction in forest growth than isolated frost in the Northern Hemisphere.Nature communications · 2025Article
- The Qinghai-Tibet Plateau: Climate change, human activity, and plant diversity.Plant diversity · 2025Review
- Emerging trend of increasing spring frost damage for beech at higher elevations in the Jura Mountains: evidence from tree-ring data.The New phytologist · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Plant distribution and productivity are shaped by environmental stressors, particularly freezing events in extra-tropical regions. In early spring, a progressive loss of cold hardiness with phenological development leaves emerging tissues vulnerable to freezing events. In many regions, climate warming is advancing phenology to a greater degree than the date of the last spring freeze, increasing the period of vulnerability to spring freezes. Studies describing critical temperatures at which spring freeze damage occurs are numerous and diverse in both the system studied and type of thresholds used (empirical vs model). Here, we review trends in previously reported thresholds for spring freeze damage across a range of plant groups (row crops, fruit trees, and forest species) over the course of phenological development in spring, and analyze potential sources of variation causing discrepancies between empirically determined and model-derived thresholds. Our analysis shows consistent reporting of higher (less-hardy) thresholds in model-based studies when compared with empirical measurements. These differences highlight a need to improve model estimations of damage by accounting for both microclimatic complexities (humidity, topography, wind speed, etc.) and physiological considerations (phenology and species) that influence the translatability between precise, empirically measured thresholds and critical temperatures used to describe damage in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.