ArticlePediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology2025
Agreement between parent reported and clinical coding of asthma, eczema and allergic rhinitis: The multi-ethnic Born in Bradford cohort.
Article in Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Agreement between parent reported and clinical coding of asthma, eczema and allergic rhinitis: The multi-ethnic Born in Bradford cohort.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDiscrepancies between parent reports and electronic health records (EHRs) challenge the accurate estimation of childhood allergic disease prevalence. This study aimed to: (1) compare parent reports of asthma, eczema, and allergic rhinitis with GP-recorded diagnoses; (2) identify factors associated with reporting differences; and (3) assess the predictive validity of parent reports for future diagnoses.
methodsData were analyzed from 2594 children (aged 4-5 years) in the UK Born in Bradford (BiB) cohort. Parent-reported symptoms and diagnoses from questionnaires were compared against diagnoses in primary care EHRs. Agreement was assessed using prevalence estimates and agreement metrics. Logistic and Poisson regression models were used to identify factors influencing reporting and to evaluate predictive validity.
resultsAgreement varied by condition. For parent-reported "ever-diagnosed" asthma, agreement with GP records was good (Kappa = 0.68), while for recent eczema symptoms, it was poor (Kappa = 0.07), though this improved after adjusting for prevalence (PABAK = 0.66). Parent reports were highly reliable for ruling out diagnoses. Factors including ethnicity and GP visit frequency were associated with reporting discrepancies. Parent reports at age 4-5 strongly predicted a future GP diagnosis, increasing the risk fivefold for asthma and threefold for allergic rhinitis.
conclusionNeither parent reports nor EHRs alone capture the full picture of childhood allergic disease. Parent reports offer crucial insights into symptom burden and future risk, while EHRs provide objective diagnostic data. An integrating approach, combining both sources, is essential for comprehensive epidemiological research and a more complete understanding of disease burden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.