Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40772275›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2025

Genetic association between

Fangfang Li, Junhui Lu, Chao Cen, Wanqiu Zhen, Jiaojiao Zhang, Shengming Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fangfang LiThe First Clinical College, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Junhui LuDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Affiliated Huai'an Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Huai'an, Jiangsu, China.
Chao CenThe First Clinical College, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Wanqiu ZhenThe First Clinical College, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Jiaojiao ZhangThe First Clinical College, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Shengming WangCollege of Stomatology, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: STAT4, a pivotal transcription factor governing immune and inflammatory responses, has been implicated in autoimmune pathogenesis. This case-control study aimed to examine the relationship between STAT4 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) in a female Chinese Han population, exploring potential genetic mechanisms underlying pSS susceptibility. Methods: Six STAT4 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (rs10931481, rs1400656, rs10168266, rs3821236, rs7601754, and rs10174238) were genotyped using MassARRAY, with Results: The rs10168266-C allele emerged as a significant risk factor for pSS, with CC homozygotes exhibiting elevated disease susceptibility compared to CT/TT carriers (Pc = 0.001, OR = 1.905). Conversely, the T allele conferred protection (Pc = 0.002, OR = 0.575), and CT genotypes were underrepresented in patients (Pc = 0.003, OR = 0.539). Notably, rs10168266-CC individuals displayed elevated Discussion: This study represents the initial investigation to uncover the genetic association between the STAT4 gene and pSS in Han Chinese women. The rs10168266 polymorphism in the STAT4 gene is a novel genetic determinant of pSS susceptibility in female Chinese Han populations. The mechanism may involve dysregulation of IL-6 signaling driven by STAT4, offering a theoretical foundation for the advancement of gene therapy.

Indexed as

genetic variantsprimary Sjögren’s syndromesingle nucleotide polymorphismSTAT4susceptibility

Identifiers

PMID40772275
PMCPMC12326203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.