ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2025
Understanding bracing outcomes in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis: a mixed-methods approach.
Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quality of life and mental health in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis undergoing brace treatment: a systematic review and pooled analysis of quantitative studies.Spine deformity · 2026Article
- Compressive bracing for pectus carinatum following congenital heart disease surgery in children: a retrospective cohort study.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Current Trends and Future Directions in the Diagnosis and Management of Pediatric Orthopedic Disorders.Cureus · 2026Review
- Economic evaluation of school scoliosis screening in Gannan Tibetan autonomous prefecture, Gansu Province: a cost-utility analysis based on decision tree-Markov model.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Brace treatment is the routinely applied conservative treatment method for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) and can yield effective results when correctly administered. Brace treatment, often initiated during adolescence, can cause individuals to face various challenges in their daily lives. This study determined the effect of spinal brace treatment on the quality of life (QoL), views, and the problems encountered regarding bracing by individuals with AIS and their parents. Methods: This study included 44 participants aged 10-17 years using spinal braces for at least six months. Participants' QoL was assessed using the Brace Questionnaire (BrQ), a numerical evaluation scale for brace satisfaction (BS), and the extracted user and parental opinions to identify the problems affecting brace use. Individual interviews were conducted with selected groups of ten participants to examine thoroughly the factors influencing spinal brace use. Results: Pearson correlation analysis revealed positive correlation between BS and total BrQ scores and sub-parameters the regression analysis to determine the cause-and-effect relationship between BS and total BrQ scores with sub-parameters was significant (F = 7.648, Conclusions: This study established a correlation between BS and QoL and identified the design, weight, and material-related issues of the orthosis as significant factors influencing brace satisfaction in individuals using spinal braces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.