Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40772267›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2025

Understanding bracing outcomes in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis: a mixed-methods approach.

Hasan İşçi, Sena Özdemir Görgü

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hasan İşçiDepartment of Orthotics and Prosthesis, Institute of Health Sciences, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkiye.
Sena Özdemir GörgüDepartment of Orthotics and Prosthesis, Faculty of Health Sciences, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Brace treatment is the routinely applied conservative treatment method for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) and can yield effective results when correctly administered. Brace treatment, often initiated during adolescence, can cause individuals to face various challenges in their daily lives. This study determined the effect of spinal brace treatment on the quality of life (QoL), views, and the problems encountered regarding bracing by individuals with AIS and their parents. Methods: This study included 44 participants aged 10-17 years using spinal braces for at least six months. Participants' QoL was assessed using the Brace Questionnaire (BrQ), a numerical evaluation scale for brace satisfaction (BS), and the extracted user and parental opinions to identify the problems affecting brace use. Individual interviews were conducted with selected groups of ten participants to examine thoroughly the factors influencing spinal brace use. Results: Pearson correlation analysis revealed positive correlation between BS and total BrQ scores and sub-parameters the regression analysis to determine the cause-and-effect relationship between BS and total BrQ scores with sub-parameters was significant (F = 7.648, Conclusions: This study established a correlation between BS and QoL and identified the design, weight, and material-related issues of the orthosis as significant factors influencing brace satisfaction in individuals using spinal braces.

Indexed as

adolescent idiopathic scoliosisbrace satisfactionparental perspectivequality of lifespinal braceuser experience

Identifiers

PMID40772267
PMCPMC12325295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.