ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025
Develop and validate a machine learning model to predict the risk of persistent pain after percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Persistent pain is a common complication following percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) for lumbar disc herniation. Identifying associated risk factors and developing a predictive model are crucial for guiding clinical decisions. This study aims to utilize machine learning models to predict persistent pain, identify key influencing factors, and construct a risk model to assess the likelihood of persistent pain. Methods: We first compared baseline characteristics and pathological indicators between patients who developed persistent pain and those who did not after PTED. Significant factors were used as input features in four machine learning models: Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), XGBoost, and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP). Each model was optimized through grid search and 10-fold cross-validation. Performance was evaluated using ROC curves, F1 score, accuracy, recall, and precision. Models with AUC values exceeding 0.9, specifically XGBoost and MLP, were selected for SHAP visualization and risk prediction model construction. Results: Among the four machine learning models, XGBoost and MLP achieved the best performance, with AUC values of 0.907 and 0.916, respectively. SHAP analysis identified a history of lumbar spine trauma and herniation calcification as key features positively influencing persistent pain risk. Elevated inflammatory markers (e.g., CRP, ESR, and WBC) and older age also significantly impacted predictions. Using the most important features from XGBoost and MLP, a risk prediction model was constructed and externally validated, achieving an AUC of 0.798, indicating good predictive accuracy. Conclusion: History of lumbar spine trauma, herniation calcification, and inflammatory markers are important predictors of persistent pain after PTED. The risk prediction model based on XGBoost and MLP shows high predictive accuracy and can serve as a valuable tool for clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.