ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2025
Reaction time variations in normal aging and elderly MCI patients under various cognitive load conditions.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trajectory-based identification of cognitive-performance phenotypes across adulthood from psychophysiological testing.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
- A Generative AI Framework for Cognitive Intervention in Older Adults: An Integrated Engineering Design and Clinical Protocol.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To compare reaction time parameters and accuracy rates between cognitively normal older adults and those with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) during the Stroop Color-Word Test, and to investigate how cognitive load modulates performance in MCI. Methods: Speech audio samples ( Results: The accuracy rate of the mild cognitive impairment (MCI) group was significantly lower than that of the control group ( Conclusion: Dominant responses require less processing time, whereas tasks demanding interference suppression elicit slower reaction times and higher error rates. MCI patients demonstrate prolonged reaction times and greater susceptibility to proactive interference compared to controls, highlighting impaired interference control mechanisms. These findings suggest that MCI is characterized by early deficits in dominance inhibition, manifesting as reduced ability to suppress automatic responses and increased vulnerability to cognitive conflict.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.