ReviewCureus2025
Minimally Invasive Techniques for Managing Dental Caries in Children: Efficacy, Applications, and Future Directions.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparative success of minimally invasive treatments for cavitated caries in primary teeth: a network meta-analysis.BMC oral health · 2025Pooled it
- Effects of graded prevention intervention combined with minimally invasive restoration on the oral health trajectory of caries-susceptible children.Frontiers in public health · 2026Trial
- Projective Indicators of Underlying Dental Anxiety in Children with Positive Frankl Behavior: A Draw-a-Person Assessment During Caries Removal.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Bridging the Gap Between Knowledge and Practice: Contemporary Preventive Strategies in Modern Dental Care-A Cross-Sectional Survey of Practicing Dentists.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Non-Operative, Micro- and Minimally Invasive Methods for Caries Treatment-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Concept and techniques for minimal invasive restorative dentistry: A review.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Comparative evaluation of clinical outcomes: Minimally invasive versus conventional restorative techniques.Bioinformation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Minimally Invasive Dentistry (MID) represents a transformative approach in pediatric caries management, emphasizing tooth preservation, patient comfort, and preventive care over conventional invasive methods. The aim of this narrative review is to evaluate the efficacy, clinical applications, and future directions of various MID techniques in children, including silver diamine fluoride (SDF), atraumatic restorative treatment (ART), the Hall Technique, resin infiltration, and bioactive restorative materials. These methods have shown considerable success in reducing treatment complexity and improving outcomes, especially for high-risk and special healthcare needs (SHCN) populations. A structured literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases for studies published between 2000 and 2025. Search terms included "minimally invasive dentistry in children," "silver diamine fluoride pediatric caries," "atraumatic restorative treatment," and related techniques. Inclusion criteria encompassed clinical trials, systematic reviews, and expert consensus articles, while animal studies and those lacking rigorous methodology were excluded. Results indicate that MID techniques such as SDF can arrest caries in 80-90% of cases, while ART and the Hall Technique provide minimally invasive, cost-effective alternatives to conventional restorations. Resin infiltration improves esthetics and arrests lesion progression in non-cavitated teeth, while bioactive materials promote remineralization and pulp preservation. Emerging technologies, including laser-assisted caries removal, air abrasion, and AI-driven diagnostics, further enhance MID accessibility and precision. Despite promising outcomes, challenges such as clinician training deficits, parental concerns, and lack of long-term evidence persist. Future efforts should focus on addressing these barriers through research, education, and policy reform to facilitate the integration of MID into routine pediatric dental practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.