ArticleCureus2025
Role of Intravenous Azithromycin as Adjunctive Therapy in Children With Acute Encephalitis Syndrome (AES): An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute encephalitis syndrome (AES) has high morbidity and mortality in children. Empirical treatment of AES often consists of third-generation cephalosporins, with vancomycin and acyclovir, and frequently excludes the use of azithromycin, targeted at scrub typhus. In a resource-constrained setting, testing for scrub typhus becomes challenging. Considering the lacunae in the existing literature, there is a need for robust evidence to determine the role of additional azithromycin use in children with AES. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjunctive intravenous azithromycin treatment in children with AES compared to standard therapy alone. MATERIAL AND
methodsAn open-label, two-arm randomized controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary care teaching hospital with a level III pediatric intensive care unit. Children aged one to 14 years with AES were enrolled. Intravenous azithromycin in addition to conventional treatment (n=30) and conventional treatment (third-generation cephalosporin, vancomycin, and acyclovir) were compared. The primary outcome measure was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcome measures included the total length of hospital stay, the proportion of children with significant disability as determined by the Liverpool Outcome Score (LOS) at discharge, and the proportion of children who experienced at least one serious adverse event.
resultsThe two groups were comparable in terms of all-cause mortality (23.3% vs. 20%; p=0.75), duration of hospital stay (12.57 days vs. 13.67 days; P=0.28), and significant disability at the time of discharge (52.40 vs. 53.47 days; P=0.79). None developed serious life-threatening adverse events.
conclusionAdditional treatment with intravenous azithromycin does not impact all-cause mortality among children with AES. Further evaluation is suggested with an adequately powered study and long-term follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.