ReviewCureus2025
Patient Partnership in Stroke Care: A Scoping Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patient partnership is increasingly recognised as a core component of high-quality healthcare. This review aims to explore how patient partnership is implemented across the stroke pathway, where recovery trajectories are complex and multidimensional. It will also show how medical education can shift student learning from a transactional process to one of partnership and collaboration. A literature search was conducted across Cochrane Library, Embase, and PubMed, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Studies were screened by title, abstract, and full text against eligibility criteria. Eleven articles were included in the review. Each article underwent quality appraisal using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool. Thematic synthesis was used, mapping findings onto three key stages of the Stroke RightCare Pathway: hyperacute, the stroke unit and early supported discharge, and long-term rehabilitation. This review found that the role of the patient and clinician has changed in modern-day healthcare from paternalistic to one that aims to actively bring clinicians and patients together to form a collaborative partnership. Tailoring this partnership in each stage of stroke care is vital. In the hyperacute stroke setting, clinician-led decisions were found to be most beneficial for the patient due to the short time window to initiate treatment. During the acute phase, educating patients to understand their condition can allow for meaningful and collaborative goal-setting to take place, which has demonstrated improved patient outcomes. In medical education, introducing patient partnership early in a student's training is essential for creating a lasting impact on healthcare. Patient partnership must be tailored across the stroke pathway, and embedding these principles in medical education is important in shaping future clinicians' attitudes and practices. Future research should explore formal patient partnership training strategies for both students and clinicians. It should also assess whether clinicians find this approach appropriate across different medical conditions and clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.