ArticleCureus2025
Impact of Missing Values in the Self-Administered Washington Group Short Set: A Cross-Sectional Study Using Secondary Data of a National Survey of Persons With Disabilities in Japan.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe Washington Group Short Set on Functioning (WGSS), consisting of six questions on basic functioning, is recommended for interviewer-administered surveys. While self-administration is a practical alternative, its impact on response accuracy is poorly understood. This study aimed to quantify the extent of missing values in responses to the self-administered WGSS and enhanced WGSS (WGSSE), consisting of the six questions of the WGSS and four additional questions on basic functioning, and to examine the association between respondents' disability-related characteristics and missing values.
methodsIn this cross-sectional study using nationally representative survey data from individuals with disabilities in Japan (n=12,822), the individual and overall percentages of missing values for the WGSS- and WGSSE-related questions were calculated. Binomial logistic regression was used to analyze the relationship between possession of disability certificates, the independent variable, and the missingness of disability status defined by the WGSS and WGSSE, the dependent variable.
resultsNon-response rates for individual WGSS- and WGSSE-related questions were 9.71-30.69%. Missingness of disability status, as defined by the WGSS and WGSSE, which was attributed to missing values for the individual questions, was observed in 16.94% and 24.32% of the participants, respectively. After adjusting for confounders, possession of a disability certificate was significantly associated with the missingness of disability status, as defined by the WGSS and WGSSE (adjusted odds ratio: 1.176-2.931).
conclusionSelf-administration of the WGSS resulted in a significant proportion of missing responses among individuals with disabilities. Fewer individuals with disability certificates may be represented in disability statistics if missing data are excluded, potentially underestimating disability prevalence by up to approximately 20%. Stakeholders in Japan should consider these drawbacks when interpreting and using the self-administered WGSS data. Further research is needed to explore the characteristics of self-administered WGSS data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.