Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40772127›Full record

ArticleClinical nutrition research2025

Perceptions of Meat Alternatives Among Adolescents in Korea.

Bo-Young Lyum, Su-Ryeon Han, Minseo Choi, Mi-Kyeong Choi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical nutrition research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bo-Young LyumMajor in Nutrition Education, Graduate School of Education, Kongju National University, Yesan 32439, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2630-8225
Su-Ryeon HanDepartment of Food and Nutrition, Kongju National University, Yesan 32439, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7030-8733
Minseo ChoiDepartment of Food and Nutrition, Kongju National University, Yesan 32439, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7660-9604
Mi-Kyeong ChoiDepartment of Food and Nutrition, Kongju National University, Yesan 32439, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6227-4053

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated adolescents' perceptions of meat alternatives and examined the relationships among their views on various types of these alternatives. A survey was conducted with 372 middle and high school students, focusing on their perceptions of 3 categories of meat alternatives: plant-based meats, edible insects, and cultured meats. The relationships among these perceptions were subsequently analyzed. Overall, 77.4% of respondents were aware of meat alternatives, and 38.7% reported having consumed them. Perception levels differed by category, with plant-based meats receiving the highest scores, followed by cultured meats and edible insects. Notably, perceptions across the different categories of meat alternatives were significantly correlated. These findings suggest that increasing awareness about meat alternatives-particularly through education-may help promote sustainable and healthy eating behaviors among adolescents.

Indexed as

AdolescentHealthy dietMeat alternativesPerceptionSustainable development

Identifiers

PMID40772127
PMCPMC12321494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.