ReviewJournal of education and health promotion2025
Revitalizing midwifery education: Overcoming challenges and enhancing clinical learning experiences.
Review in Journal of education and health promotion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Student-generated learning materials as active learning: a qualitative study of midwifery students' experiences.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Impact of a virtual reality-enhanced learning program for maternal positioning in midwifery students: an exploratory multicenter pre-post study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Midwifery is vital for maternal and neonatal healthcare, especially in regions with limited obstetric care. Rigorous training and licensure enable midwives to provide expert care from preconception to postpartum, significantly reducing maternal and neonatal mortality. This narrative review aims to map research on midwifery training, identify gaps, and propose strategies to enhance trainee midwives' clinical learning experiences in labor rooms. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for studies published between 2010 and 2023. Inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed articles in English focusing on midwifery education and clinical training. Data were extracted on study objectives, methodologies, sample sizes, key findings, and enhancement strategies. Of the 439 articles, 61 studies were included: 31 focused on challenges and 30 on enhancement strategies. Key challenges include individual factors (fear of mistakes, lack of confidence), inadequate support systems, and resource limitations. Effective strategies encompass simulation-based learning, mentorship, multidisciplinary collaboration, and mobile learning tools. Addressing these challenges with improved resources and support is crucial for preparing competent midwives, ultimately enhancing maternal and neonatal health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.