Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40772084›Full record

ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2025

Empowering perimenopausal women: A critical examination of opportunistic teaching on cervical cancer awareness.

Lisa Chadha, Poonam Sharma, Neeta Bhide, Inu Arya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lisa ChadhaNursing Tutor, College of Nursing, AIIMS, Vijaypur, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Poonam SharmaMental Health Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, SGT University, Gurugram, Haryana, India.
Neeta BhideSAIMS College of Nursing, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Inu AryaMental Health Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, SGT University, Gurugram, Haryana, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the presence of screening and effective vaccines, cervical cancer continues to rank among the most prevalent cancers in India. Perimenopausal women commonly lack awareness and hold a pessimistic attitude toward the disease. The study to evaluate the impact of opportunistic teaching on increasing knowledge about cervical cancer awareness. MATERIALS AND

methodsA single-group pre-test, post-test design was used to select 120 women attending the Gynecological Outpatient Department (OPD) at a Peri-Urban Teaching Hospital in Haryana using a convenient sampling technique. The pre-test knowledge score was collected on the first day using a semi-structured questionnaire. The descriptive and inferential statistics were utilized to analyze the data.

resultsThe initial assessment found that 55.83% of women had inadequate knowledge. After a single teaching session, only 1.67% of women had poor knowledge, 46.17% had average knowledge, and 51.67% had good knowledge of cervical cancer. The respondents' mean post-test knowledge score of 13.540 was notably greater than their mean pre-test knowledge score of 7.30. The participants' knowledge scores demonstrated a strong correlation with both parity and their family history of cancer (

conclusionThere is a lack of knowledge and awareness about cervical cancer regardless of age, social status, religion, and education level among perimenopausal women. Opportunistic teaching is a cost-effective and efficient way to improve awareness of cervical cancer in a resource-limited country such as India.

Indexed as

Cervical cancerHPV vaccineopportunistic teachingPap smearperimenopause women

Identifiers

PMID40772084
PMCPMC12327746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.