ReviewJournal of education and health promotion2025
Impact of artificial intelligence on academic performance in medical education: A systematic review.
Review in Journal of education and health promotion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The effectiveness of GAI-assisted teaching methods in medical education: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- Postgraduate General Practice Training Under Early Clinical Responsibility: A Narrative Review on System-Based Supervision and the Supportive Role of Artificial Intelligence.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence assisted simulation and surgical video analytics for ophthalmic surgery training and competence development.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- From "teaching by word and deed" to "intelligent mentorship": ethical reconsiderations of AI-enabled medical education - lessons from China.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) plays a significant role in improving the quality of medical education. This study aimed to investigate the application of AI in medical education. A systematic review was conducted of all educational intervention studies in medical courses from January 1986 to 2023. Of the 16755 studies initially identified by our search, 7387 remained after removing duplicates. After that, 6205 studies were excluded for the title and abstract screening. Then, 15 full-text articles were included in our final review. The following keywords were used: artificial intelligence, machine intelligence, medical education, medical teaching, precision medical teaching, and precision medical education. A total of 16745 articles were identified from ISI, PubMed, Scopus, and Educational Resources and Information Center (ERIC) databases. Fourteen studies met the eligibility criteria. The quality of the included articles was appraised by the best evidence medical education (BEME) review of the education portfolio. PICO consists of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.