ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2025
Patient experience between vibration and coughing techniques during subcutaneous insulin injection on pain severity and individual satisfaction: Randomized controlled trial.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of immersive virtual reality on pain and anxiety during lumbar puncture: A randomized controlled trial.Journal of education and health promotion · 2026Article
- Impact of burden of care upon psychological wellbeing and quality of life among family caregivers for cancer patients.Journal of education and health promotion · 2026Article
- Sawdust-plaster cast mixture versus traditional cast: Which type reduced pain and increases comfort and enhancing healing process among patients with twisting: A randomized controlled clinical trial.Journal of education and health promotion · 2026Article
- Self-management behaviors and its correlation with maintenance blood glucose level control among diabetes mellitus patients: A longitudinal design study.Journal of education and health promotion · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiabetes mellitus represents a chronic illness distinguished by sustained elevations in blood glucose concentrations, and it ranks as the sixth foremost cause of mortality globally. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis randomized controlled experimental study was conducted consisted of 105 patients divided into three groups (36 vibration group, 38 coughing technique group, and 31 control group) who applied subcutaneous insulin injections in hospitalized adults' patients with type 2 diabetes between September 2024 and January 2025 to examine the effect of the coughing technique and vibration device on the intensity of pain and the degree of patient satisfaction during the administration of subcutaneous insulin injections. The study data were collected using the Structured Information Form, VAS for Pain, and VAS for Satisfaction. The data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics (Chi-square tests).
resultsThe age of the participants included in this study ranged between 18 years and older with a mean age of (51.61 ± 15.048) years and females accounted for 62.1% of total study participants. The highest group of the study population has finished their primary graduate degree (30.7%).
conclusionsConsort statement was followed for reporting. After the subcutaneous insulin injections, a significant difference was found between the groups in terms of the mean scores of VAS for Pain and VAS for Injection Satisfaction (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.