ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
GrotUNet: a novel leaf segmentation method.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the field of biology, the current leaf segmentation method still has problems such as missed inspections and duplication in the number of large, dense, mutual obstruction and vague division tasks. The reason for the above is that image semantic extraction is not satisfactory and semantic parsing is still insufficient. To address the above problems, this paper proposes GrotUNet, a novel leaf segmentation method that can be trained end-to-end. The algorithm is reconstructed in three aspects: semantic feature coding, hopping connectivity, and multiscale upsampling fusion. The semantic coding structure consists of GRblock, WGRblock, and OTblock modules. The former two make full use of the design ideas of GoogLeNet parallel branching and Resnet residual connectivity, while the latter further mines the fine-grained semantic information distributed in the feature space on the feature map after extraction by the WGRblock module to make the feature expression richer. Unlike UNet++ dense connectivity, jump connection reconstruction only uses
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.