Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40772054›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025

GrotUNet: a novel leaf segmentation method.

Hongfei Deng, Bin Wen, Cheng Gu, Yingjie Fan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hongfei DengKey Laboratory of Ethnic Education Informatization, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, China.
Bin WenKey Laboratory of Ethnic Education Informatization, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, China.
Cheng GuSchool of Information Science, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, China.
Yingjie FanSchool of Information Science, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the field of biology, the current leaf segmentation method still has problems such as missed inspections and duplication in the number of large, dense, mutual obstruction and vague division tasks. The reason for the above is that image semantic extraction is not satisfactory and semantic parsing is still insufficient. To address the above problems, this paper proposes GrotUNet, a novel leaf segmentation method that can be trained end-to-end. The algorithm is reconstructed in three aspects: semantic feature coding, hopping connectivity, and multiscale upsampling fusion. The semantic coding structure consists of GRblock, WGRblock, and OTblock modules. The former two make full use of the design ideas of GoogLeNet parallel branching and Resnet residual connectivity, while the latter further mines the fine-grained semantic information distributed in the feature space on the feature map after extraction by the WGRblock module to make the feature expression richer. Unlike UNet++ dense connectivity, jump connection reconstruction only uses

Indexed as

feature codingGoogLeNetinstance segmentationjump connectionmulti-scale fusion

Identifiers

PMID40772054
PMCPMC12327041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.