ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
key-fg DETR based camouflaged locust objects in complex fields.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In real agricultural environments, many pests camouflage themselves against complex backgrounds, significantly increasing detection difficulty. This study addresses the challenge of camouflaged pest detection. Methods: We propose a Transformer-based detection framework that integrates three key modules: 1.Fine-Grained Score Predictor (FGSP) - guides object queries to potential foreground regions; 2.MaskMLP generates instance-aware pixel-level masks; 3.Denoising Module and DropKey strategy - enhance training stability and attention robustness. Results: Evaluated on the COD10k and Locust datasets, our model achieves AP scores of 36.31 and 75.07, respectively, outperforming Deformable DETR by 2.3% and 3.1%. On the Locust dataset, Recall and F1-score improve by 6.15% and 6.52%, respectively. Ablation studies confirm the contribution of each module. Discussion: These results demonstrate that our method significantly improves detection of camouflaged pests in complex field environments. It offers a robust solution for agricultural pest monitoring and crop protection applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.