ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2025
Engaging Essential Patient Support Personnel in Research as Patient Partners: A Survey Study.
Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Patient engagement in research is a collaborative interaction between patients and researchers throughout the entire research process. Healthcare workers provide care for others, but are the patients themselves in areas of workplace safety and mental health. Essential patient support personnel working on the front line of healthcare are particularly vulnerable but have an underrepresented voice in the research conducted about their health and work. Methods: To explore this topic, a survey study of essential patient support personnel (N=42), guided by the Integrated Model of Behavioral Prediction, measured attitudes about engagement, behavioral intentions, and past engagement behavior. Skills and constraints, predictors of behavioral intentions for engagement in the model, were also assessed. Results: Results showed that essential patient support personnel had positive attitudes and positive behavioral intentions to engage in research, yet only two participants had engaged in research in the past. Participants reported the most positive behavioral intentions to contribute at the preparation stage of research. Overwhelmingly, participants reported that the most important skill essential patient support personnel bring to a research team is their first-hand experience. Significant constraints to engagement included a lack of time, insufficient compensation, and job burnout. Conclusion: Efforts to bolster patient engagement in research should focus on increasing the skills necessary for study execution (eg, study design and data analysis) and removing constraints to contribution (eg, providing appropriate monetary compensation, being mindful of time and heavy work schedules).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.