ReviewOncoTargets and therapy2025
Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors in Lung Neuroendocrine Tumors - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in OncoTargets and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are well-differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms of lung origin, including typical and atypical carcinoids (ACs). Therapeutic options for this rare disease are limited in daily clinical practice. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are under clinical investigation. Here, we report a systematic reappraisal about ICIs results in lung NETs. We reviewed articles on observational or interventional studies that reported efficacy data of ICIs in lung NETs. Case reports and studies with insufficient data were excluded from the analysis. We searched the electronic databases Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library up to May 2024. Two investigators independently screened the identified records and assessed studies quality. We summarized the results descriptively and in a meta-analysis of ORR according to the type of intervention. The search retrieved 1344 records. After selection, we included 11 studies in the meta-analysis of ORR, with a total of 128 adult patients with lung NET (25% ACs) that were progressing after at least one line of systemic therapy, including treatment with somatostatin analogs. Ten studies were Phase II, and 1 study was phase Ib. The summary ORR was 14.7% (95% CI, 5.8-32.2), 44.4% (27.2-63.1) for ACs. Subgroup analysis by intervention types showed a trend for lower ORR of lung NETs treated with ICI monotherapy (ORR: 2.7%; 0.0-63.7) compared with combinations (p-value: 0.056). The combination of temozolomide plus nivolumab showed the highest ORR (66.7%; 33.3-88.9). The median OS (reported in 2 studies) was not reached. Safety was consistent with historical data of ICIs. Our work suggests that ICIs are a promising treatment for patients with lung NETs, especially ACs, and warrant further investigation in more focused studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.