ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Enhanced management strategy of synchronous percutaneous biopsy and microwave ablation in patients with lung ground-glass opacities undergoing antithrombotic treatment: a clinical perspective on our experience.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This retrospective study was conducted to delineate our experience in managing perioperative antithrombotic agents in patients receiving antithrombotic therapy underwent percutaneous biopsy and microwave ablation (B+MWA) for lung ground-glass opacities (GGOs). Methods: The study comprised 67 patients with GGOs who receiving antithrombotic therapy underwent B+MWA sessions from January 1, 2020, to May 31, 2022. During the perioperative period, patients who received rivaroxaban as a bridging drug were assigned to Group A, and who interrupted the antithrombotic therapy were assigned to Group B. Information about the technical success rate, positive biopsy rate, local control rates, and major bleeding and thrombotic complications were collected and analyzed. Results: Group A comprised 36 patients (19 males; mean age, 67.97 ± 8.49 years), while Group B comprised 31 patients (12 males; mean age, 65.48 ± 4.32 years). The technical success rate was 100%. The positive biopsy rates were 94.44% and 96.77%, respectively. In group A and B, the overall local control rates at 6, 18, and 24 months were 100.0% vs. 100.0%, 94.44% (34/36) vs. 96.77% (30/31), and 86.11% (31/36) vs. 87.10% (27/31), with no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.2156). During the perioperative period, a single case of lower extremity venous thrombosis was identified in Group A, while three cases of lower extremity venous thrombosis, one case of new-onset cerebral infarction, and one case of new-onset pulmonary embolism were identified in Group B, with no statistically significant difference in the overall incidence of bleeding and thrombotic complications between the two groups. Conclusions: Compared with direct interruption of antithrombotic therapy, the use of rivaroxaban in the perioperative period of B+MWA in patients with GGOs who are receiving antithrombotic therapy can reduce the incidence of severe thrombotic complications without increasing the risk of bleeding, with a satisfactory effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.