ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Machine learning-driven prognostic prediction model for composite small cell lung cancer: identifying risk factors with network tools and validation using SEER data and external cohorts.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of an explainable machine learning model for mortality prediction in ICU patients with lung cancer.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
- Analysis and implications of validation results for a clinical data-based early warning model for geriatric sepsis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- From Simple Scores to Intelligent Systems: Encouraging the Development, Validation and Adoption of Robust Prognostic Tools in Small Cell Lung Cancer.Technology in cancer research & treatmentReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lung cancer continues to be the primary cause of cancer-related mortality globally, with combined small cell lung carcinoma (C-SCLC) constituting a relatively uncommon yet highly aggressive subset of this disease. Despite its clinical significance, limited efforts have been made to develop survival prediction models tailored to the clinical characteristics of C-SCLC patients. Additionally, the interpretability of existing models remains limited. Methods: This study aimed to develop and validate an interpretable machine learning model for predicting survival outcomes in C-SCLC patients using clinical data from the SEER database and external validation with Chinese patient cohorts. Initially, we employed the Cox proportional hazards model for rigorous variable selection. Subsequently, through 10-fold cross-validation and grid search for optimal parameters, we selected the XGBoost model as the best-performing one among four candidates. Furthermore, we enhanced the model's interpretability by incorporating the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method, which helped us understand the contribution of each variable within the model. Results: We constructed a predictive model using data from 1,230 SEER patients and validated it externally with data from 154 Chinese patients. The XGBoost model demonstrated excellent performance in predicting survival outcomes at 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year. The AUC values for the external validation cohort were 0.849, 0.830, and 0.811, respectively. SHAP analysis revealed that N stage, T stage, radiotherapy, surgery, and gender are key factors influencing the ML model's predictions. To enhance clinical utility, we have developed an interpretable web-based tool to predict patients' 1-year survival probability. Conclusion: The XGBoost model, integrating demographic and clinical factors of C-SCLC patients, demonstrated excellent predictive performance. Our web-based prediction tool will promote the development of personalized treatment strategies and optimize clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.