ReviewFrontiers in neurology2025
Influencing factors related to stroke patients' rehabilitation motivation: a scoping review.
Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-World Analysis of Olanzapine and Functional Outcomes in Outpatient Cancer Rehabilitation.Cancers · 2026Article
- Critical Assessment of Optimal Timing to Initiate Post-Stroke Rehabilitation.Archives of internal medicine research · 2026Article
- Integrated virtual reality and musical biofeedback for intensity-guided training on stationary cycling: A comparative feasibility study.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Effect on Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Combined With Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Anxiety and Depression in Stroke Patients With Dysphagia.Actas espanolas de psiquiatria · 2026Article
- Article
- A structural causal model for robot-assisted upper-limb neurorehabilitation.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Article
- Motivation in motor training interventions after stroke-a systematic review.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Review
- Exploring person-centredness in technology-based gait rehabilitation after stroke: A scoping review framework analysis.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mounting epidemiological evidence indicates a rising global prevalence of stroke among adults and older populations, often leading to severe functional impairments that compromise daily living. While rehabilitation exercise is recognized as a safe and effective strategy for functional recovery, inadequate rehabilitation motivation frequently undermines therapeutic efficacy. Exercise adherence plays a critical role in mitigating physical disability and mortality rates, yet current research lacks systematic insights into influencing of patient rehabilitation motivation. This scoping review synthesizes evidence from 23 studies across domestic and international databases to identify multidimensional factors influencing post-stroke rehabilitation motivation. Key influencing include intrinsic drivers (e.g., self-efficacy, depression), extrinsic supports (familial or social support, economic burden), disease-specific characteristics (severity, functional deficits), and intervention strategies (cognitive-behavioral therapy, gamified rehabilitation). Findings highlight the necessity of integrating personalized motivational assessments into clinical protocols and developing interdisciplinary interventions to address motivational barriers. These insights provide a foundation for optimizing rehabilitation frameworks and improving long-term patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.