ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025
Pharmacokinetics and safety evaluation of anemoside B4 in healthy Beagle dogs.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Anemoside B4 (AB4), a pentacyclic triterpenoid saponin extracted from the traditional Chinese medicinal herb Methods: In the single-dose pharmacokinetic study, 40 dogs received subcutaneous AB4 at 10, 20, or 40 mg/kg, or an intravenous bolus at 20 mg/kg. Plasma concentrations were measured using a validated HPLC-MS/MS method to determine pharmacokinetic parameters, bioavailability, dose proportionality, and sex-related differences. In the repeated-dose study, 10 dogs received 20 mg/kg subcutaneously once daily for 7 consecutive days to evaluate drug accumulation and fluctuation. In the target animal safety study, 32 dogs were randomly assigned to receive 1× (20 mg/kg), 3× (60 mg/kg), or 5× (100 mg/kg) doses of AB4, and saline as a control, via daily subcutaneous injection for 7 days. Routine clinical examinations, hematology, serum biochemistry, gross necropsy, and histopathology were assessed. Result: AB4 exhibited rapid elimination, high absolute bioavailability, and dose-proportional pharmacokinetics in the 10-40 mg/kg range. No evidence of accumulation after repeated dosing. Within the dose range of 20-100 mg/kg, AB4 demonstrated good safety, with no observable toxicity or adverse effects. No significant effects were observed on physiological parameters. Histopathological analysis revealed no consistent or target-organ specific lesions. Discussion: These findings provide fundamental pharmacokinetic and safety data to support the rational clinical use of AB4 in veterinary medicine and lay the groundwork for future clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.